The Challenges of Spell Checking Maps


  In conventional spell-checkers, words are validated against one or several lists of correctly spelled words called dictionaries. If a word is in a dictionary, it is deemed correctly spelled. Otherwise, it is not. If the latter case, conventional spell-checkers typically offer users a number of closely matching, but correctly spelled, words.

The map spell-checking process is similar but is more challenging for several reasons:

  • Many of the words on maps are geographic names. Conventional dictionaries, such as those used in word processors, may contain the spelling of some major geographic features such as countries and state capitals but are unlikely going to contain local geographic names, and for a good reason. Many of those spellings are only valid at certain geographic locations. 
  • Maps can contain abbreviations or codes such as zoning codes on a parcel layer. Those abbreviations or codes are typically not in alphabetical dictionaries and placing them in custom dictionaries may reduce the spell-checking accuracy of other maps for which those codes or abbreviations are not correct.
  • Some words are unlikely to be found in maps. Even though they exist and are correctly spelled, they are likely misspellings for other words. For example, sight for site, pubic for public, bed for bad, stuff for staff.
     
  • GIS Maps, through their underlying databases, can contain enormous amounts of text. 

The MapSpeller spell-checker uses Locationaries (spatial dictionaries) and built-in smarts to handle these situations.

 
Related Topics
 

MapSpeller™ 3 for ArcGIS®
Page last updated on February 10, 2010
Copyright © 2001-2010 Edgetech America, Inc. All Rights Reserved.